Michael Jackson v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. . Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant challenging the vol-untariness of his plea through a timely collateral motion. .See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. 1 DAMOORGIAN, C.J., TAYLOR and. KLINGENSMITH, JJ;, concur. Footnotes [1] We decline to consider the trial court’s order denying appellant's motion to withdraw plea because it was entered after the notice of appeal was filed, at which point the trial court lacked jurisdiction to proceed. Also, no notice of appeal places that order before this court. Smith v. State, 113 So.3d 110, 111 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).