Raske v. the Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.

An unpublis d order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADfi a); 194M IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VVILLIANI JEFFREY RASKE, No. 67093 Petitionen ve. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT F E L E D COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, , IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF JUL 2 3 2915 CLERK, IE MAN Reepondent. __ *7 fig U uwcuaau ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRI T OF M’DAM US 0R PH OHIBI T1 ON ‘ This pro se writ petition challengee a district court default judgment and a post-judgment ruling on a claim of exemption. In light of the underlying matter’s progression since this writ petition was filed, We conclude that our extraordinary intervention is unwarranted. NRS 34.160; NBS 34.320; Pan U. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 1: 20 Nev. 222, 228 , 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2.004) (recognizing that the petitioner bears the burden of demenstrating that this court’s intervention is warranted). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. Saitta Gibbons Pickering cc: William Jeffrey Raske Attorney GeneralfCarsun City Eighth District Court Clerk , $1933?