Escobar, Marvin Geovanny v. State

Opinion issued March 27, 2003. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-01-01091-CR MARVIN GEOVANNY ESCOBAR, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 177th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 818040 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Marvin Geovanny Escobar, pled nolo contendere to felony sexual assault of a child and was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for five years. One year later, the State filed a motion to adjudicate his guilt, asserting that appellant had violated the terms of his community supervision. The trial court held a hearing, and then adjudicated appellant’s guilt and assessed punishment at 20 years’ confinement. In two points of error, appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the taped confession presented at his adjudication hearing because the taped confession was obtained in violation of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. No appeal may be taken from a determination by a trial court of whether to proceed with an adjudication of guilt on the original charge due to a violation of a condition of community supervision. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art 42.12 § 5(b) (Vernon 1979 & Supp. 2003). A defendant on deferred adjudication who is adjudicated guilty of the original charge may not raise on appeal contentions of error in the adjudication of guilt process. Connolly v. State, 983 S.W.2d 738, 741 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). This includes assertions that the evidence used at the adjudication hearing was illegally obtained. Holder v. State, 618 S.W.2d 80, 81 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). See also Reagan v. State, 832 S.W.2d 125,127 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no pet.). Accordingly, we overrule both of appellant’s points of error. Conclusion We affirm the judgment of the trial court. George C. Hanks, Jr. Justice Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Nuchia and Hanks. Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).