Kirk Wayne McBride v. Jack Bremer, Sheriff Comal County Detention Center Brian John, Jail Administrator Bill Collins, Assistant Jail Administrator And Sergeant T. Schroeder

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-94-00091-CV Kirk Wayne McBride, Appellant v. Jack Bremer, Sheriff; Comal County Detention Center; Brian John, Jail Administrator; Bill Collins, Assistant Jail Administrator; and Sergeant T. Schroeder, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C93-694-C, HONORABLE FRED A. MOORE, JUDGE PRESIDING PER CURIAM Appellant Kirk Wayne McBride appeals from an order of the district court of Comal County denying his request for a temporary injunction in his suit against appellees Jack Bremer, Sheriff; the Comal County Detention Center; Brian John, the jail administrator; Bill Collins, the assistant jail administrator; and Sergeant T. Schroeder. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.14(4) (West Supp. 1995); Tex. R. App. P. 42(a)(1). Because the trial court has rendered a final order in the underlying proceeding, we will dismiss this appeal as moot. The trial court signed the order denying McBride's request for injunctive relief on January 1, 1994. McBride timely perfected his appeal; however, this Court did not receive the transcript and statement of facts until February 25. See Tex. R. App. P. 42(a)(3) (record is due in an accelerated appeal thirty days after trial court signs order appealed from). The Clerk of this Court notified McBride of the late receipt of the record; he responded with a motion to continue the appeal explaining the reasons for the delay. In the meantime, the trial court signed a final order dismissing the claims in the underlying cause. (1) See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 13.001 (West Supp. 1995). If a trial court renders a final judgment during the appeal of an order denying injunctive relief, the cause on appeal becomes moot. Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Group, P.A., 802 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex. 1991); PCA Health Plans of Tex., Inc. v. Rapoport, 882 S.W.2d 522, 525 (Tex. App.--Austin 1994, no writ). When a case becomes moot on appeal, the appellate court must set aside all orders relating to the temporary injunction and dismiss the cause. Isuani, 802 S.W.2d at 236; Texas Foundries, Inc. v. International Moulders & Foundry Workers' Union, 248 S.W.2d 460, 461 (Tex. 1952); Texas Dep't of Health v. Long, 659 S.W.2d 158, 161 (Tex. App.--Austin 1983, no writ). To decide the appeal under these circumstances would constitute an advisory opinion on an abstract question of law. Texas Parks & Wildlife Dep't v. Texas Ass'n of Bass Clubs, 622 S.W.2d 594, 596 (Tex. App.--Austin 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e). On the other hand, to dismiss only the appeal would effectively affirm the trial court judgment without considering any assignments of error. Texas Foundries, Inc., 248 S.W.2d at 461. Accordingly, we set aside the order denying McBride's request for injunctive relief and dismiss the portion of the cause pertaining to the request for temporary injunctive relief. Id. We also dismiss the motion to continue the appeal. Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Jones and Kidd Order Set Aside and Cause Dismissed Filed: May 31, 1995 Do Not Publish 1. 1 McBride perfected his appeal from that final order, which this Court affirmed. McBride v. Bremer, No. 3-94-00236-CV (Tex. App.--Austin May 31, 1995, no writ h.).