Alan Gene Batson v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-96-00737-CR Alan Gene Batson, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 19,335, HONORABLE CHARLES E. LANCE, JUDGE PRESIDING A jury found appellant guilty of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. Penal Code, 63d Leg., R.S., ch. 399, sec. 1, § 46.05, 1973 Tex. Gen. Laws 883, 964 (Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 46.05, since amended and renumbered as § 46.04). The jury assessed punishment at imprisonment for ten years and a $10,000 fine. Appellant contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to sustain the conviction and that the district court erred by permitting him to be seen by the jury wearing leg irons. We will overrule these contentions and affirm the conviction. The indictment alleged that appellant possessed a .22 caliber pistol away from the premises where he lived and after he had been convicted of "the felony offense of aggravated assault, being a felony involving an act of violence and threatened violence to Pete Maciula ...." Appellant contends the evidence is factually insufficient to prove he possessed the pistol and legally insufficient to prove that his previous felony conviction involved an act of violence or threatened violence against Pete Maciula. Appellant was driving a pickup truck when he was stopped by Rockdale police officer Ken Inman, who was executing a warrant for appellant's arrest issued in another county. A second officer, Cecil Hamm, also participated in the stop and arrest. Inman testified that after the pickup stopped, he saw appellant "grabbing for something in the front seat near his right leg. It's a motion I have seen before. It usually indicates somebody reaching for a weapon." Appellant did not immediately comply with Inman's order to raise his hands, but instead kept his right hand at his side. When appellant finally did raise his right hand, Hamm saw a pistol on the seat beside appellant. Hamm testified that appellant's hand had been on the pistol. This .22 caliber weapon was seized and introduced in evidence. A second man, identified at trial as Blakeley, was in the pickup with appellant at the time of the stop. Blakeley did not testify. The pickup belonged to John Jackson. Jackson testified that appellant was driving the pickup with his permission and that the pistol belonged to him. Appellant testified that the pistol had been covered by papers and that he did not know that the weapon was in the truck. He explained that he did not immediately raise his hands when ordered to do so because he was attempting to unbuckle his seatbelt. When conducting a factual sufficiency review, we consider all the evidence equally, including the testimony of defense witnesses and the existence of alternative hypotheses. Orona v. State, 836 S.W.2d 319, 321 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no pet.). We will set aside a verdict for factual insufficiency only if it is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust. Clewis v. State 922 S.W.2d 126, 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Stone v. State, 823 S.W.2d 375, 381 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, pet. ref'd as untimely filed). Applying this standard to the evidence before us, we hold that the jury's finding that appellant possessed the pistol was not clearly wrong or unjust. Point of error three is overruled. The alleged prior conviction was Terry County cause number 2825. The State introduced in evidence the indictment and judgment of conviction from that cause. The indictment accused appellant of "attempt[ing] to cause the death of Pete Maciula, an individual, by intentionally and knowingly shooting the said Pete Maciula with a firearm ...." The judgment recites that appellant pleaded guilty "to the charge contained in the indictment" and was convicted of the lesser included offense of aggravated assault. Aggravated assault is a crime of violence as a matter of law. Ortega v. State, 792 S.W.2d 145, 149 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1990, pet. ref'd). The Terry County judgment states that appellant pleaded guilty to the charge contained in the indictment, which alleged that he shot Pete Maciula with a firearm. The evidence is legally sufficient to sustain a finding that the prior felony conviction involved an act of violence against Pete Maciula. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979); Geesa v. State, 820 S.W.2d 154 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Griffin v. State, 614 S.W.2d 155 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Point of error two is overruled. Before the jury panel was brought into the courtroom for voir dire, defense counsel complained that appellant had been brought to the courtroom in leg irons and had passed through the area where the panelists were gathered. Counsel objected that this infringed on appellant's presumption of innocence. The objection was overruled, but the court ordered that the leg irons be removed before the jury entered the courtroom. Appellant argues that the court "erred [by] allowing [him] to be taken into the presence of the jury array while in leg irons." The record shows that the court did no such thing. Appellant voiced his objection after he was allegedly seen by the panelists. There is nothing in the record to suggest that the district court knew that appellant would be shackled, much less to support the assertion that the court permitted appellant to be seen by the jury in that state. As soon as the matter was brought to the court's attention, the leg irons were ordered removed. There is no evidence that any member of the jury saw appellant wearing the leg irons. Reversible error is not shown. See Long v. State, 823 S.W.2d 259, 283 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Point of error one is overruled. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Mack Kidd, Justice Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Jones and Kidd; Chief Justice Carroll not participating Affirmed Filed: February 26, 1998 Do Not Publish eley, was in the pickup with appellant at the time of the stop. Blakeley did not testify. The pickup belonged to John Jackson. Jackson testified that appellant was driving the pickup with his permission and that the pistol belonged to him. Appellant testified that the pistol had been covered by papers and that he did not know that the weapon was in the truck. He explained that he did not immediately raise his hands when ordered to do so because he was attempting to unbuckle his seatbelt. When conducting a factual sufficiency review, we consider all the evidence equally, including the testimony of defense witnesses and the existence of alternative hypotheses. Orona v. State, 836 S.W.2d 319, 321 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no pet.). We will set aside a verdict for factual insufficiency only if it is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust. Clewis v. State 922 S.W.2d 126, 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Stone v. State, 823 S.W.2d 375, 381 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, pet. ref'd as untimely filed). Applying this standard to the evidence before us, we hold that the jury's finding that appellant possessed the pistol was not clearly wrong or unjust. Point of error three is overruled. The alleged prior conviction was Terry County cause number 2825. The State introduced in evidence the indictment and judgment of conviction from that cause. The indictment accused appellant of "attempt[ing] to cause the death of Pete Maciula, an