Ollie Christman, III v. State

No. 04-98-00014-CR Ollie CHRISTMAN, III, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 94-CR-5826-W Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding Per Curiam Opinion Sitting: Tom Rickhoff, Justice Catherine Stone, Justice Paul W. Green, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 19, 1998 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Ollie Christman pled no contest to aggravated assault and the court deferred his adjudication for ten years. Subsequently, Christman was charged with violating certain terms of his probation, he was adjudicated on the State's motion and he was sentenced to eight years in prison. In five points of error, Christman asserts the judgment violated collateral estoppel and double jeopardy, and was unsupported by the evidence. Because this appeal arises from the trial court's decision to adjudicate the defendant guilty after the defendant's adjudication was deferred, we must dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12, § 5(b) (Vernon Supp. 1998); Phynes v. State, 828 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). Prohibited appeals include appeals based on constitutional issues such as double jeopardy. See Willis v. State 856 S.W.2d 851 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1993, no pet.). Prohibiting such appeals does not violate the due process requirements of the federal or state constitutions as the federal constitution does not require a state to maintain an appellate system, and the Texas appellate process is statutorily, not constitutionally, based. Phynes 828 S.W.2d at 2.(1) We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH 1. Further, even if we had jurisdiction to consider appellant's contentions that the state's actions implicated the legal doctrines of collateral estoppel and double jeopardy, these arguments are without merit. See Chambers v. State, 700 S.W.2d 597, 599 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985); Russell v. State, 551 S.W.2d 710, 714 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977).