Frank J. Holdampf, Individually and D/B/A Patriot Oil Company v. Jasmine Road Development Company, L.L.C.

2) Caption, civil cases COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS FRANK J. HOLDAMPF, Individually and d/b/a PATRIOT OIL COMPANY, Appellant, v. JASMINE ROAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.C., Appellee. § § § § § § No. 08-02-00174-CV Appeal from the 385th District Court of Midland County, Texas (TC# CV-43,129) MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 9, 2002, the Court ordered this appeal held in abeyance due to an automatic stay after the filing of Chapter 13 bankruptcy by Frank J. Holdampf doing business as Patriot Oil Company. See 11 U.S.C. § 362. On February 5, appellee Jasmine Road Development Company, L.L.C., filed a Motion to Reinstitute Appellate Process pursuant to Rule 8.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The case underlying the stay, In re: Frank J. Holdampf, debtor, was dismissed with prejudice on December 19, 2002, by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas, Midland-Odessa Division. A letter from the appellee regarding this motion mentions that Mr. Holdampf may be appealing that decision by the bankruptcy court. In relevant part, 11 U.S.C. § 362(c) provides terms for the duration of the automatic stay protecting the debtor: (c) Except as provided in subsections (d), (e), and (f) of this section-- (1) the stay of an act against property of the estate under subsection (a) of this section continues until such property is no longer property of the estate; and (2) the stay of any other act under subsection (a) of this section continues until the earliest of-- (A) the time the case is closed; (B) the time the case is dismissed; or (C) if the case is a case under chapter 7 of this title concerning an individual or a case under chapter 9, 11, 12, or 13 of this title, the time a discharge is granted or denied. 11 U.S.C. § 362(c). The automatic stay has been terminated by the dismissal of the case by the order of the bankruptcy judge. Although a stay may be continued pending appeal, the debtor must affirmatively act to obtain that stay pending appeal and post a supersedeas bond. See In re Regency Woods Apartments, Ltd., 686 F.2d 899, 903 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of a supersedeas bond or an order providing for a stay, the filing of a petition to review an order of a bankruptcy judge does not stay effect or operation of the order. In re Abingdon Realty Corp., 530 F.2d 588, 589 (4th Cir. 1976). In the present case, we have no evidence of an appeal or a stay pending appeal. The motion to reinstate this appeal is granted. The motion is granted and the appeal is reinstated. SUSAN LARSEN, Justice March 6, 2003 Before Panel No. 1 Larsen, McClure, and Chew, JJ.