Full text
JENKINS METAL SHOPS, INC., Appellees, v. PNEUMAFIL CORPORATION, Appellant
PER CURIAM.
Upon a copious record and after observing the accused machine in operation, the District Judge concluded that the device does not infringe appellant’s patent. We have reviewed the record and are in accord with the Judge’s findings and conclusions. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 303 F.Supp. 653 (W.D.N.C.1969), its judgment is
Affirmed.