in the Matter of R.J. Lamar Dickerson

In the Matter of RJ Lamar Dickerson WITHDRAWN 12/31/02 IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-02-262-CV IN THE MATTER OF R.J. LAMAR DICKERSON From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court # 1995-117-J MEMORANDUM OPINION R. J. Lamar Dickerson appeals the juvenile court’s 1995 order waiving its jurisdiction and transferring him to a district court to be tried as an adult. The juvenile court signed the transfer order on September 5, 1995. At that time, section 56.01(c)(1)(A) of the Family Code provided for an interlocutory appeal of such an order. Act of May 23, 1991, 72d Leg., R.S., ch. 680, § 1, 1991 Tex. Gen. Laws 2466, 2466 (amended 1995) (current version at Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. 44.47 (Vernon Supp. 2003)); see In re S.D.G., 861 S.W.2d 106, 106 (Tex. App.—Waco 1993, no writ). Then (and now) a juvenile appeal was governed by the rules for civil appeals. Act of May 25, 1973, 63d Leg., R.S., ch. 544, § 1, sec. 56.01(b), 1973 Tex. Gen. Laws 1460, 1483 (amended 1997) (current version at Tex. Fam. Code. Ann. § 56.01(b) (Vernon 2002)); S.D.G., 861 S.W.2d at 106. Under the current appellate rules and the rules in effect at the time the juvenile court signed the transfer order, an appeal in a civil case must be perfected within thirty days after the order being appealed is signed if the appealing party does not timely file a post-order motion or request sufficient to extend this time period to ninety days. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1; Tex. R. App. P. 41(a)(1), 707-708 S.W.2d (Tex. Cases) liii (Tex. 1986, amended 1997); S.D.G., 861 S.W.2d at 106. Dickerson filed no timely post-order motion or request in the juvenile court. He filed his notice of appeal seven years after the juvenile court signed the transfer order. We notified Dickerson by letter dated November 6, 2002 that this appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction because of the untimely notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); see also Tex. R. App. P. 60(a)(2), 707-708 S.W.2d (Tex. Cases) lxxii (Tex. 1986, amended 1997). He has not responded. Because Dickerson’s notice of appeal is untimely, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. S.D.G., 861 S.W.2d at 106-07; Raley v. Lile, 861 S.W.2d 102, 105-06 (Tex. App.—Waco 1993, writ denied). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Davis, Justice Cummings, and Justice Vance Dismissed for want of jurisdiction Opinion delivered and filed December 18, 2002 Do not publish [CV06]