Avery J. Smith v. State

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-05-00045-CR Avery J. Smith, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court # 2004-410-C MEMORANDUM Opinion Avery J. Smith appeals from his plea-bargained conviction of aggravated robbery. The trial court’s certification regarding Smith’s right of appeal and documents contained within the clerk’s record affirmatively show that Smith has no right to appeal, and he waived his right of appeal. His signed waiver states “I desire to WAIVE each and all of my rights to Appeal, including the filing a Motion for New Trial, requesting permission to appeal, appealing matters raised by written motion prior to trial, giving Notice of Appeal, appealing the Judgment, Sentence or Order of the Court, and a free record, transcript and attorney on appeal.” Thus, Smith has no right to appeal. The appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); High v. State, 115 S.W.3d 581, 582 (Tex. App.—Waco 2003, pet. ref’d). PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Vance, and Justice Reyna Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed March 9, 2005 Do not publish [CR25] ="text-align: justify; line-height: 0.388889in"> The testimony of accomplice Hill is sufficiently corroborated through the testimony of the non-accomplice witnesses who identified Appellant. Appellant exited the stolen van when it returned to the apartment complex, he ran and was captured by Officer Cosby. Applying the Jackson test, the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction. Points one and two are overruled. Point three: "The judgment should be reformed to delete the affirmative finding of a deadly weapon as there is no evidence that Appellant personally used a deadly weapon." Where the State relies on the law of parties, no affirmative finding of a deadly weapon is permissible unless the accused personally used or exhibited a deadly weapon. Travelstead v. State, 693 S.W.2d 400, 402 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). No witness testified that Appellant personally used or exhibited a deadly weapon. The State concedes that this point should be sustained. Point three is sustained. The judgment is reformed to delete the deadly weapon finding. Reformed and affirmed. FRANK G. McDONALD Chief Justice (Retired) Before Justice Cummings, Justice Vance, and Chief Justice McDonald (Retired) Reformed and affirmed Opinion delivered and filed June 21, 1995 Do not publish