Christopher Jovel Garcia v. State

11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Opinion Christopher Jovel Garcia Appellant Vs. No. 11-01-00324-CR B Appeal from Dallas County State of Texas Appellee The trial court convicted appellant, upon his plea of guilty, of failure to register as a sex offender. Appellant entered a plea of true to an enhancement allegation. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for 6 years and a $2,500 fine. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a general notice of appeal rather than the specific notice of appeal required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(b)(3) in guilty plea - plea bargain agreement situations. Appellant later amended his notice of appeal to comply with Rule 25.2(b)(3); however, this amended notice of appeal was not filed within the original time requirements for perfecting an appeal under TEX.R.APP.P. 26.2 and is not effective. State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408 (Tex.Cr.App.2000); Brown v. State, 53 S.W.3d 734 (Tex.App. - Dallas 2001, pet=n ref=d); Martinez v. State, 50 S.W.3d 572 (Tex.App. - Fort Worth 2001, pet=n ref=d); Garcia v. State, 43 S.W.3d 725 (Tex.App. - Houtson [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet=n); Betz v. State, 36 S.W.3d 227 (Tex.App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet=n); Craddock v. State, 32 S.W.3d 886 (Tex.App. - Waco 2000, no pet=n). Because appellant failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 25.2(b)(3), the appellant jurisdiction of this court has not been invoked. White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424 (Tex.Cr.App.2001); Vidaurri v. State, 49 S.W.3d 880 (Tex.Cr.App.2001). We are without authority to consider this appeal. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. July 25, 2002 PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.3(b). Panel consists of: Arnot, C.J., and Wright, J., and McCall, J.