Edgar Roman Cruz v. State

11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Opinion Edgar Roman Cruz Appellant Vs. No. 11-03-00040-CR -- Appeal from Dallas County State of Texas Appellee Edgar Roman Cruz entered an open plea of guilty to the offense of injury to a child. The trial court convicted appellant and assessed his punishment at confinement for 35 years and a $5,000 fine. We affirm. Appellant presents three issues for review. In the first issue, appellant contends that the State failed to prove that he caused the injuries to the child. In the second and third issues, appellant challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence. The record from the plea hearing shows that appellant entered an open plea of guilty. Before accepting appellant’s guilty plea, the trial court inquired about the voluntariness of the plea. Appellant stated that he wanted to enter a plea of guilty. Appellant received the appropriate admonishments and signed the guilty plea documents, including the waiver of his rights, the judicial confession, and the acknowledgment of the admonishments. Appellant stated that he had discussed this case with his attorney and that he understood his rights. Appellant was aware that his punishment was totally up to the discretion of the trial court. There is nothing in the record to support an assertion that appellant’s plea was involuntary. Appellant asserts that his conviction was not supported by the evidence. The arguments in appellant’s brief are based upon the evidence introduced during the punishment phase of trial. During the punishment phase, the State merely introduced evidence regarding the extensive nature of the injuries to the victim, a three-year-old girl. When a guilty plea is made to the court, the State must introduce sufficient evidence to support the plea. TEX. CODE CRIM. PRO. ANN. art. 1.15 (Vernon Supp. 2003). In such a case, the trial court is the trier of facts and may find the defendant guilty as charged, guilty of a lesser included offense, or not guilty as it believes the facts require. Moon v. State, 572 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); see also Thomas v. State, 599 S.W.2d 823 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Sommer v. State, 574 S.W.2d 548 (Tex.Cr.App.1978). A judicial confession alone is sufficient to support a conviction. Dinnery v. State, 592 S.W.2d 343 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). In this case, appellant’s judicial confession was admitted at the plea proceeding. In his judicial confession, appellant admitted that he knowingly and intentionally injured the child as alleged in the indictment. Consequently, appellant’s issues on appeal are overruled. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. JIM R. WRIGHT JUSTICE December 4, 2003 Do not publish. See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Arnot, C.J., and Wright, J., and McCall, J.