Octavio Orlando Rodriguez v. State

NUMBER 13-99-531-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ OCTAVIO ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ , Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee. ___________________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ___________________________________________________________________ O P I N I O N Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Seerden(1) Opinion by Justice Rodriguez Octavio Orlando Rodriguez, appellant, appeals from a conviction of aggravated robbery with a habitual felony offender enhancement. In his sole issue, he complains the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter judgment because there was no valid indictment. We affirm. We previously abated and remanded this cause for the trial court to determine whether entry of a written order purporting to grant appellant's motion to quash the indictment was clerical error.(2) The trial court has since held a hearing, concluded the written order was clerical error, and entered a judgment nunc pro tunc correcting the same. Because the trial court found that its order ostensibly granting the motion to quash was clerical error, and because the judgment nunc pro tunc corrects the order so that it reflects the court denied the motion to quash, appellant's argument that the court was without jurisdiction to enter judgment because it had quashed the indictment fails. See Smith v. State, 801 S.W.2d 629, 633 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1991, no pet.) (power of court to correct clerical error exists at any time) (citing Knox v. Long, 152 Tex. 291, 294-98, 257 S.W.2d 289, 291-93 (1953)); State v. Evans, 817 S.W.2d 807, 809 (Tex. App.­Waco [Panel Op.] 1980), rev'd on other grounds, 843 S.W.2d 576 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (citing Alverez v. State, 605 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1980)). Appellant's sole issue is overruled. The judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ Justice Do not publish . Tex. R. App. P. 47.3. Opinion delivered and filed this 26th day of April, 2001. 1. Senior Justice Robert J. Seerden assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.003 (Vernon 1998). 2. See Rodriguez v. State, No. 13-99-531-CV, 2001Tex. App. Lexis 904, at *1 (Corpus Christi, February 8, 2001) (order abating and remanding for hearing).