in Re: Christus Spohn Health System Corporation A/K/A Spohn Kleberg Memorial Hospital

v03252.ord NUMBER 13-04-00081-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE: CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION A/K/A SPOHN KLEBERG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez and Castillo Opinion Per Curiam Relator, Christus Spohn Health System Corporation a/k/a Spohn Kleberg Memorial Hospital, filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct the respondent, the Honorable J. Manuel Banales, presiding judge of the 105th Judicial District Court of Kleberg County, Texas, to vacate his order, dated January 23, 2004, in Cause No. 02-644-D, denying relator's motion to dismiss. Relator also filed a motion for emergency temporary relief requesting that this Court stay any and all proceedings in the underlying suit pending our review of the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a). Relator asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in denying its motion to dismiss because the record conclusively establishes that the expert report filed by the real-party-in-interest failed to comply with article 4590i of the Texas Revised Civil Statutes. Following a hearing on relator's motion to dismiss, and real-party-in-interest's Motion for Additional Time to Amend Plaintiff's Expert's Report, the trial court denied both motions, concluding that the expert report was adequate. Mandamus will issue only to correct a clear abuse of discretion when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992). A trial court abuses its discretion when it does not follow guiding rules and principles and reaches an arbitrary and unreasonable decision. Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 839; Republic Royalty Co. v. Evins, 931 S.W.2d 338, 342 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1996, orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Woman's Hospital of Texas, Inc., No. 02-0748, 2004 Tex. LEXIS 196 (March 5, 2004) (concurring in part and dissenting in part to denial of petitions for writ of mandamus). Accordingly, relator's petition for mandamus is denied, and relator's motion for emergency temporary relief is dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Opinion delivered and filed this 10th day of March, 2004.