Full text
Stephen Philip KELLER, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas

Loading…
Opinion
2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1740 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 2004
Full text
Stephen Philip KELLER, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Nov 27, 2018
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Aug 30, 2018
Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso) · May 25, 2018
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Dec 7, 2017
Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas) · Jul 27, 2017
Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas) · Apr 27, 2017
Parentheticals
holding appellant = s judicial confession was sufficient evidence to show he used a deadly weapon, and the record need not otherwise provide proof
“A presumption of truthfulness and regularity applies to documents filed in the trial court.”
“A presumption of truthfulness and regularity applies to documents filed in the trial court.”