Full text
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Daniel NADEAU, Defendant-Appellant
PER CURIAM:
Appellant’s contention that his conscientious objector claim should have been considered by his local board is disposed of by Ehlert v. United States, 401 U.S. -, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).
His contention that the local board was improperly constituted is disposed of by United States v. Nix, 437 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Wallace, 435 F.2d 12, 14-15 (9th Cir. 1970).
Judgment affirmed.