Bank One NA v. Nailer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

Consolidated Cases Nos. 02-60734, 02-60778, 02-60746, 02-60766, 02-60762, 02-60745, 02-60786, 02-60752, 02-60747, 02-60779, 02-60802 Summary Calendar _______________________

Case No. 02-60734

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MICHELLE JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60778

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

GREGORY LEDELL THOMAS; PRINCELLA THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60746

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

VELMA GREEN, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60766

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MACK ARTHUR PICKENS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60762

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

J. C. ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60745

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARILYN NAILER, A/K/A MARILYN NAILOR; BARRY NAILER, A/K/A BARRY NAILOR, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60786

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

THOMAS WRIGHT; ANNIE WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60752

BANK ONE NA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

JOANN NEWSON, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60747

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

GLORIA JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60779

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LOYD WALTON, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60802

BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CLARA BUTLER, A/K/A CLARA BULTER, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (3:01-CV-39) _____________________________________________ February 25, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*

Appellants challenge the district court’s rulings granting Bank One’s motions to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellants’ pending state law claims. This case is indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in the related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd1 and Bank One, N.A. v. Lake.2 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank One, N.A. v. Coates,3 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor,4 the judgment of the district court in this case is, in all respects, AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 1 288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002). 2 No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished). 3 125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001). 4 No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order granting petition to compel arbitration).