Deny and Opinion Filed April 25, 2014.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00489-CV
IN RE LESTER SMITH, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1359889
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans
Relator files this petition for writ of mandamus alleging that the trial court has failed to follow the proper procedures in determining his pre-trial writ of habeas corpus. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein.
This Court has not been given general supervisory control over district and county courts. Texas Emp. Ins. Ass'n v. Kirby, 150 S.W.2d 123, 126 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1941, no writ); see also Guillory v. Davis, 527 S.W.2d 465, 466 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1975, no writ). In a criminal case, an applicant for mandamus relief must establish that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress the harm he has suffered, and he must show that the act he seeks to compel or prohibit does not involve a discretionary or judicial decision. Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). The record before the Court does not show that relator has met this burden. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, the Court DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus.
/David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
140489F.P05
–2–