Pharisien v. State

*1285 ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PER CURIAM. Upon remand from the Florida Supreme Court, we reconsider Jerry Pharisien’s convictions for second-degree murder with a firearm and attempted second-degree murder with a firearm' in light of the subsequent decisions in Griffin v. State, 160 So.3d 63 (Fla.2015), and Daniels v. State, 121 So.3d 409 (Fla.2013). Because the 2008 standard jury instruction on manslaughter by act suffers from the same infirmity found erroneous in State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010), the jury instruction given at Pharisien’s trial was erroneous. See Daniels, 121 So.3d at 419. And because Pharisien was convicted of second-degree murder, which is only one step removed from the necessarily lesser-included offense of manslaughter, this error was fundamental. Id. at 415, 419. The fact that Pharisien’s defense was that hé was simply not present at the scene of the shootings does not change this result. See Griffin, 160 So.3d at 67 (determining that “a sole defense of misidentification does not concede or fail to place in dispute intent or any other element of the crime charged except identity when the offense charged is an unlawful homicide”). Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the circuit court for a new trial. Reversed and remanded for a new trial. NORTHCUTT, 1 KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.