Loading…

Carl Beasley Ford, Inc. v. Burroughs Corporation — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Carl Beasley Ford, Inc. v. Burroughs Corporation

493 F.2d 1400 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Apr 16, 1974

Full text

Carl Beasley Ford, Inc. v. Burroughs Corporation

493 F.2d 1400 Carl Beasley Ford, Inc. v. Burroughs Corporation 73-1820 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 4/16/74 E.D.Pa., 361 F.Supp. 325 AFFIRMED

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 317997

Citations

493 F.2d 1400

Cited by

City Nat. Bank of Charleston v. Wells
West Virginia Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1989
Nachazel v. Miraco Mfg.
Supreme Court of Iowa · Nov 23, 1988
Carnation Co. v. Olivet Egg Ranch
California Court of Appeal · Aug 20, 1986
Draft Systems, Inc. v. Rimar Manufacturing, Inc.
E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1981
William G. Barnhart, and George S. Barnhart, Doing Business as W & G Associates, a Partnership v. Dollar Rent a Car Systems, Inc.
Third Circuit · Mar 27, 1979
S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Warner Company
Third Circuit · Apr 17, 1978
Hussey Metals Division of Copper Range Co. v. Lectromelt Furnace Division, McGraw Edison Co.
W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1976
United Telecommunications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. American Television and Communications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Tenth Circuit · Jun 16, 1976

Parentheticals

upon revocation of acceptance of defective computer which failed to work during whole year when in plaintiff’s possession, plaintiff may recover as consequential damages interest on third party loan that defendant knew it would take out to finance purchase
United Telecommunications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. American Television and Communications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation