Full text
State ex rel. Carter v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas.
[Cite as State ex rel. Carter v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas., 2016-Ohio-3328.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 104086
STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. DARNELL F. CARTER
RELATOR
vs.
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL. RESPONDENTS
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 494908 Order No. 496561
RELEASE DATE: June 8, 2016
FOR RELATOR
Darnell F. Carter Inmate No. 660778 Belmont Correctional Institution 65518 Bannock Road, P.O. Box 540 Saint Clairsville, Ohio 43950
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENTS
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor The Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.:
{¶1} Darnell F. Carter has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Carter seeks an order from this court requiring respondents Judge Astrab and the common pleas court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the denial of the motion for postconviction relief that Carter filed on March 12, 2015, in Cuyahoga C.P. Nos. CR-14-582508-A, CR-14-583209-A, CR-14-583775-A, and CR-14-585343-A. Respondents have filed a motion for summary judgment indicating that the petition is moot because findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed in these cases on March 29, 2016. Respondents have provided copies of these orders in support of the motion for summary judgment. The motion for summary judgment is granted.
{¶2} Respondent Judge Astrab has performed the act that is sought to be compelled by this original action; therefore the petition is moot. State ex rel. Culgan v. Kimbler, 132 Ohio St.3d 480, 2012-Ohio-3310, 974 N.E.2d 88 (a writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed); see also State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 99259, 2013-Ohio-1567, ¶ 2.
{¶3} Respondents’ motion for summary judgment is granted, and Carter’s petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. Relator to pay costs. Costs waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).
{¶4} Writ denied.
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., JUDGE
SEAN C. GALLAGHER, P.J., and TIM McCORMACK, J., CONCUR