The People v. Nadine Panton

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre- Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post- *1145 Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpre-served for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]). We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur. Order affirmed, in a memorandum.