Lunday v. Jones

PER CURIAM. The majority of the court, consisting of ANDERSON, C. J., McCLELLAN, SAYRE, THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., are of the opinion that the cause should be reversed for the reason there was no note of *327 testimony as required by Chancery Practice Rule 75 (Code 1907, p. 1551), under the authority of the recent ca&e of Potts v. Court of Com’rs, 203 Ala. 300, 82 South. 550, and the several authorities therein cited. It therefore results that the decree is reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded. Footnotes [1] <S^For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes