Thomasson v. State

PER CURIAM. As far as we have been able to review tbe opinion of tbe Court of Appeals, we bave found no error. We bave been unable to review most of tbe questions raised by tbis application, for tbe reason that sucb review would involve inquiries of fact, sucb as tbis court bas heretofore in numerous cases refused to indulge. Postal Telegraph, etc., v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. Writ denied. ANDERSON, O. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.