Barton v. Shea

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 278 · Connecticut Superior Court · Oct 27, 1936

Full text

Royal Barton v. Jeremiah F. Shea

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority — Jennings

The defendant has pleaded in abatement because of the admitted failure of the plaintiff to fully comply with General Statutes Section 5619 in regard to the filing of a bond. The plaintiff seeks permission to amend to cure this formal defect. It would doubtless be within the power of the legislature to dispense with this formality but until it does the recognizance or certificate of financial responsibility is a condition precedent to the validity of the writ and the defect is not amendable. Morse vs. Rankin, 51 Conn. 326; Harris vs. Harris GansCo., 3 Conn. Sup. 434. Motion denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: JENNINGS, J.
Cluster ID: 3331848

Citations

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 278
4 Conn. Supp. 278
1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 181

Cited by

Honan v. Burton, No. 30 23 91 (Apr. 7, 1993)
Connecticut Superior Court · Apr 7, 1993
Steinkamp v. Jacque
Connecticut Superior Court · Jul 3, 1979

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service