Full text
W. E. Wright, Plaintiff in Error, v. S. H. Tatarian and W. E. Wright & Company, a Florida Corporation, Defendants in Error
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, arid briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, *1367 therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of Crackwaner v. Carlton Natl. Bank, 98 Fla. 792, 124 So. R. 275, and Edgar v. Bacon, 97 Fla. 679, 122 So. R. 107.
Affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J,, concur.