D'Alessandro v. Lee County Bank & Trust Co.

Per Curiam: This cause having been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein and briefs ahd arguments of 'counsel for the' respective parties, and the record having been inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no 'error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circüit Court appealed from be, and the s'ame is hereby, affirmed. See Reid v. Barry, 93 Fla. 849, 112 So. 846; Geter v. Simmons, 57 Fla. 423, 49 So. 131; Shad v. Smith, 74 Fla. 324, 76 So. 897; McKeown v. Allen, 37 Fla. 490, 20 So. 556; Florida National Bank v. Sherouse, 80 Fla. 405, 86 So. 279; Mansfield, et al., v. Johnson, 51 Fla. 239, 40 So. 196; Hunter v. State Bank of Florida, 65 Fla. 202, 61 So. 497; Willys-Overland, Inc., v. Blake, 97 Fla. 626, 121 So. 884; Westgersbee v. Dekle, 145 So. 199. Affirmed. Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.