Loading…

Jones v. Neibergall — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Jones v. Neibergall

1949 Fla. LEXIS 1465 · Supreme Court of Florida · Oct 14, 1949

Full text

Jones v. Neibergall

Opinions in this case

Majority — Per curiam
Dissent

Affirmed. ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, and SEBRING, JJ., concur. HOBSON and BARNS, JJ., dissent.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Cluster ID: 3400960

Citations

1949 Fla. LEXIS 1465
42 So. 2d 443

Cited by

Medary v. Dalman
Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 19, 1954

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service