Loading…

Hill v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Hill v. State

158 Fla. 889 · Supreme Court of Florida · May 16, 1947

Full text

Wade Hill v. State of Florida

Opinions in this case

Majority — Per curiam
Dissent — Buford

PER CURIAM: The judgment appealed from is affirmed. THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN, ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur. BUFORD, J., dissents.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Thomas, Terrell, Chapman, Adams, Barns, Buford
Cluster ID: 3402415

Citations

158 Fla. 889
1947 Fla. LEXIS 662
30 So. 2d 497

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service