Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained, for lack of proper parties. The facts are similar to and are governed by the principle announced in Edwards v. Wall, 153 Ga. 776 (113 S. E. 190) : “All persons who are interested in sus *465 taming or reversing the judgment of the court below are indispensable parties in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals; and they must be made parties to the bill of exceptions.”
Writ of error dismissed.
Broyles, C. J., and Gardner, J., concur.

Loading…