Loading…

Brainerd v. Potratz — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Brainerd v. Potratz

566 F.2d 1177 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 20, 1977

Full text

Brainerd v. Potratz

566 F.2d 1177 Brainerd v. Potratz No. 76-2240 United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit 10/20/77 [1] N.D.Ill. AFFIRMED

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 351297

Citations

566 F.2d 1177

Cited by

Moats v. Village of Schaumburg
N.D. Illinois · Mar 14, 1983
Whelehan v. County of Monroe
W.D. New York · Feb 22, 1983
Crumpacker v. Civiletti
N.D. Indiana · May 6, 1981
Sorenson v. Zapien
D. Colorado · Sep 18, 1978
Zurek v. Woodbury
N.D. Illinois · Mar 17, 1978

Parentheticals

dismissed under Rule 8 a complaint that was “prolix, argumentative, and replete with legal conclusions”
Crumpacker v. Civiletti

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service