People v. Commack

Bushnell, J. This is an appeal on leave granted from a sentence imposed by the circuit court of Macomb county, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for hew trial. Earl Commack, sometimes known as Jack McCormick, was convicted in 1940 by a jury, of the offense of statutory rape. Section 520 of the penal code, Act No. 328, Pub. Acts 1931 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 17115-520, Stat. Ann. § 28.788). The information charged that the offense was committed on January 18, 1940, against one Betty McCormick, a female person under the age of 16 years. The proofs show that Betty is the daughter of the defendant. After conviction, Commack was sentenced to serve not less than 20 nor more than 40 years in the State prison. Being without funds, he was represented at the trial by counsel appointed by the court. Later, Commack, through counsel of his own selection, filed various petitions and motions in the circuit court and in this Court, all of which were denied. On February 10, 1944, he filed a petition for leave to file a motion for new trial on the ground of newly *412 discovered evidence, namely, that his daughter, Betty, was born on February 18, 1923, which would make her age more than 16 at the time the offense was charged. He appeared in this matter before the circuit judge through another counsel, and the petition for leave to file a motion for new trial was heard and denied on February 21, 1944. He then, through still .another attorney, sought leave to appeal. The solicitor general, after considering the matter, recommended to this Court that, because of the circumstances, the relief sought should not be opposed by the State. A delayed appeal was granted by this Court on January 3, 1945. Defendant then filed his claim of appeal and the settled record was transmitted to this Court, together with the circuit court file. We have also been furnished with a transcript of the testimony. Counsel’s brief in defendant’s behalf so challenged the attention of this Court and the solicitor general that an order was entered on June 4, 1945, continuing the cause over the term, “for the purpose of taking a deposition from Dr. W. Wilson Lynd of Ironton, Ohio, and such other witnesses as the parties to this cause deem necessary to be submitted to the Honorable Alton H. Noe, circuit judge for the county of Macomb, for certification to this Court as an amended record.” This amended record shows that George F. Roberts, an assistant prosecuting attorney of Ma-comb county, accompanied by John L. Potter, defendant’s counsel, went to Ironton, Ohio, interviewed Dr. Lynd, and thoroughly investigated the date of birth of Betty Commack. There was on file in the vital statistics division of the Ohio department of health a delayed certificate, which was received and filed on August 12, 1942. It was signed by Helen P. Clark, probate judge of Lawrence *413 county, Ohio, and shows the birth of Elizabeth Car-mack as February 18, 1923. Attached to the concise statement of facts as settled by Honorable Alton H. Noe, circuit judge, on April 3, 1945, is. an affidavit of Dr. Lynd, executed on September 18, 1943, which confirms the date in the birth certificate filed in 1942. The amended record in this cause contains, in addition to the testimony of prosecutor Roberts, a certified photostatic copy of an original birth certificate filed on January 31, 1924, in the vital statistics bureau of the Ohio department of health. This certificate, signed by Dr. Lynd, shows that Mary Elizabeth Cammack, the daughter of Earl James Cammack and Hannah "Wilson Cammack, was born in the city of Ironton, Ohio, on January 29, 1924. There is also in the amended record an affidavit executed by Dr. Lynd on October 18, 1945, in which he refers to the conflicting certificates of birth and the affidavit given to the probate judge of Lawrence county, Ohio. In this last instrument, executed by Dr. Lynd, he indicates that he will make an effort to ascertain from his office records “which is the correct date of the delivery of this female child known as Elizabeth Cammack or Commack.” As a -result of the investigation by the prosecutor and Commack’s then attorney, his counsel sought permission from this Court to be relieved from further responsibility in the matter, assigning the following reasons: “1. That your petitioner was retained by the defendant under certain representations and upon your petitioner’s investigations, and after the appeal had been filed, your petitioner learned that such representations were false. “2. That your petitioner is of the opinion that the defendant in the above captioned cause wilfully *414 withheld material facts from your petitioner and that such facts, had they been known to petitioner, would have resulted in your petitioner refusing to undertake to represent the defendant in his appeal. “3. That your petitioner cannot continue to represent the defendant in the above captioned cause for the reason that he does not wish to become a party to a fraud upon the court. “4. That the appellant has advised your petitioner that he is going to represent himself in any further appearances before the court.” Since the filing of this petition, Commack has acted as his own lawyer and has filed numerous papers in this Court in which he protests his innocence of the charge of statutory rape and denies any perpetration of fraud. We are satisfied from the records and file in this cause that Mary Elizabeth, sometimes known as Betty McCormick, Cammack or Commack, was under the age of 16 at the time of the original offense with which defendant was charged. Defendant testified in his own behalf at the trial. He said his name was Jack McCormick, but that he was married under the name of Earl Carmack; that he was born in Columbus, Ohio, married his wife in Ironton, having met her there in 1923, and that when Betty was born in 1924 (sic) he was working at the Ford Motor Company in Detroit, and that he had used the name of McCormick since coming to Detroit, the latter part of 1923 or the early part of 1924. He further testified that his mother’s name was Cora Commack, the name being spelled in several ways, Commack or Cammack, that when married his name was incorrectly written as Carmack, and that he was known in the Navy as Jack McCormick. Further discussion of the many papers' in the file before us and elaboration of the facts seem unnecessary. *415 The question of the date of birth of Betty is one of fact, and that óf age of consent is a material element of the statutory offense. The sentence imposed was within the statutory limits and is not, as claimed by defendant, “cruel, inhuman and unjust punishment” in view of the nature of the crime charged. The various errors assigned in defendant’s brief have been examined and are found to be without merit. Appellant has not been denied any civil or constitutional rights, nor was he convicted on coerced and perjured testimony as claimed by him. We have examined the transcript of testimony, the certified record and supplemental record, and find that Commack had a fair and impartial trial. We have also considered his argument that, “If the allegations had been true, the proper charge would be ‘bastardy’ or ‘incest’ and not rape.” The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying defendant’s motion for new trial. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Care, C. J., and Butzel, Shabpe, Boyles, Reid, and North, JJ., concurred. Dethmebs, J., did not sit.