Loading…

Pratt v. Magnuson — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Pratt v. Magnuson

87 N.H. 486 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jun 4, 1935

Full text

Merle J. Pratt v. Hazel M. Magnuson & A.

Per Curiam. The defendants were entitled to the order granting the motion as matter of law. Farnum v. Company, 69 N. H. 231. Exception overruled.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Cluster ID: 3570159

Citations

87 N.H. 486
1935 N.H. LEXIS 56
179 A. 355

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service