White v. Dakin

Peaslee, J. There was no evidence to justify a finding of fraud. Such a conclusión would have been mere conjecture. Deschenes v. Railroad, 69 N. H. 285, 288, et seq. *633 The testimony of the creditor was properly excluded. Although not a party of record, he was directly interested in the result of the appeal. Foster v. Ela, 69 N. H. 460. FJxceptions overruled. Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.