Full text
Joseph P. Rosenfeld, Complainant-Appellant, v. Roebling Coal Co., Inc., a Corporation of New York, Et Al., Defendants-Respondents
Per Curiam.
We have carefully examined the record and the arguments of counsel in this cause. The conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor, who dismissed the complainant’s hill seeking a receiver for the defendant company, was in all respects proper, because the bill lacked proofs and was insufficient.
The decree of dismissal is, therefore, affirmed.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.