Full text
Otto G. Schultz Et Al., Complainants-Appellants, v. Earl H. Johnson Et Al., Defendants-Respondents
*569 Per Curiam.
The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Learning.
The grounds stated by him for refusing a preliminary injunction go to the root of the case, and his decision to dismiss the bill as not showing a ease for equitable relief was a necessary result of the reasoning contained in the opinion, which we adopt as adequate for an affirmance of the decree under review.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tbenchaed, Paeeee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskibk, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.