Full text
Sarah H. Zweig, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Benjamin Zweig, Defendant-Respondent
Per Curiam.
This is the wife’s appeal from an order of the court of chancery dated February 28th, 1934, denying her motion to strike out the husband’s answer in a divorce case.
A careful examination of the record satisfies us that the motion was properly denied, and the order under review is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskib, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.