Loading…

Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Company v. Mellon — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Company v. Mellon

1926 N.Y. LEXIS 700 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1926

Full text

Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Company, Respondent, v. Andrew W. Mellon, Director-General of Railroads, Appellant

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3596853

Citations

1926 N.Y. LEXIS 700
244 N.Y. 542
155 N.E. 889

Cited by

Haak v. Brost Motors Inc.
New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1970

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service