Loud v. Clifford

Per Curiam. This is an action to rescind a purchase of corporate stock upon the ground that the sale was brought about by fraud on the part of the defendant corporation and the individual defendant who was the promoter, president and principal stockholder thereof. It is contended that the judgment against the individual defendant cannot be sustained. Appellant relies upon a statement contained in the opinion in the case of Ritzwoller v. Lurie (225 N. Y. 464), which it is urged overruled by implication the decision in the case of Mack v. Latta (178 N. Y. 525). The opinion in the Mack case was concurred in by all but one of the members of the court. It was a carefully considered opinion and deliberately established the principle in this State that individual officers of a corporation may be joined in an equity action to rescind the purchase of corporate stock induced by the fraud of the corporation and such officers, and to recover the amount paid there *218 for. It has been repeatedly cited and followed by this court and other courts of the State. It was not intended in the decision of the Bitzwoller case to overrule it and in so far as the opinion in that case may be so construed it is disapproved. The case of Mack v. Latta is still the law of the State. The judgment in each action should be affirmed, with costs. Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur; Lehman, J., not sitting. Judgments affirmed.