Loading…

Rotenbach v. . Young — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Rotenbach v. . Young

237 N.Y. 620 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1924

Full text

Louis O. Rotenbach, Respondent, v. Sarah E. Young Et Al., Appellants

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., C-ardozo, Pound, McLaughijn, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3599029

Citations

237 N.Y. 620
1924 N.Y. LEXIS 923
143 N.E. 767

Cited by

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Clark
New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 4, 1929

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service