Loading…

Beskow v. Halow — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Beskow v. Halow

1929 N.Y. LEXIS 756 · New York Court of Appeals · May 28, 1929

Full text

Axel Beskow, Appellant, v. Hulda B. Halow, Respondent, Impleaded With Another

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3599658

Citations

1929 N.Y. LEXIS 756
251 N.Y. 514
168 N.E. 409

Cited by

Wright v. Shapiro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Mar 18, 2005
Mortimer B. Burnside & Co. v. Havener Securities Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · May 10, 1966

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service