Loading…

Fagan v. . Ulrich — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Fagan v. . Ulrich

222 N.Y. 696 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1918

Full text

Mary E. Fagan Et Al., Respondents, v. Charles E. Ulrich Et Al., Appellants, Impleaded With Another

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3600401

Citations

222 N.Y. 696
1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1583
119 N.E. 1055

Cited by

Allen v. Oscar G. Murray Railroad Employes' Benefit Fund
New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1920

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service