Loading…

Lee v. Woodward — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Lee v. Woodward

259 N.Y. 628 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1932

Full text

Arthur M. Lee, Respondent, v. Stanley P. Woodward, Appellant

Motion for reargument or to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 259 N. Y. 149.)

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3603489

Citations

259 N.Y. 628
1932 N.Y. LEXIS 1107
182 N.E. 210

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service