Loading…

Pierce v. Armour Company — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Pierce v. Armour Company

1930 N.Y. LEXIS 936 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1930

Full text

Harold A. Pierce, Respondent, v. Armour & Company, Appellant

Judgment affirmed with costs; no opinion. Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3604572

Citations

1930 N.Y. LEXIS 936
253 N.Y. 568
171 N.E. 786

Cited by

Hogeboom v. Protts
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · May 27, 1968
Knox v. Palmer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Mar 15, 1936

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service