Loading…

Barber v. . Rowe — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Barber v. . Rowe

235 N.Y. 549 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1923

Full text

Mary Barber Et Al., Respondents, v. William H. Rowe, Jr., Et Al., Appellants

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and.Andrews, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3604653

Citations

235 N.Y. 549
1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1267
139 N.E. 730

Cited by

Gelman v. Joseph P. Day, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · May 15, 1930

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service