Loading…

Hogg v. . Lindridge — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Hogg v. . Lindridge

206 N.Y. 743 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1912

Full text

Caroline F. Hogg, Appellant, v. Amelia T. Lindridge Et Al., Respondents, Impleaded With Others

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion. Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., G-ray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cullen, G-Ray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Bartlett, Hiscock
Cluster ID: 3604995

Citations

206 N.Y. 743
1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1172
100 N.E. 1128

Cited by

Hogg v. Maxwell
S.D. New York · May 23, 1916

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service