Loading…

Doll v. . Coogan — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Doll v. . Coogan

168 N.Y. 656 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1901

Full text

Charles Doll Et Al., Appellants, v. Matthew Coogan Et Al., Respondents

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Parker, Ch. J.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3606070

Citations

168 N.Y. 656
1901 N.Y. LEXIS 982
61 N.E. 1131

Cited by

Midtown Contracting Co. v. Goldsticker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Dec 31, 1914
Barrett v. Schaefer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 10, 1914

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service