Loading…

Hoykendorf v. . Bradley Contracting Company — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Hoykendorf v. . Bradley Contracting Company

227 N.Y. 646 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1919

Full text

Matilda Hoykendorf, Appellant, v. Bradley Contracting Company, Respondent

Motion for re-argument or to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 227 N. Y. 204.)

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3607634

Citations

227 N.Y. 646
1919 N.Y. LEXIS 823
126 N.E. 912

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service