Full text
Leo DiTomasso, Appellant and Respondent, v. Vito Loverro Et Al., Respondents, and Samuel Rubel Et Al., Respondents and Appellants

Loading…
Opinion
1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1119 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1937
Full text
Leo DiTomasso, Appellant and Respondent, v. Vito Loverro Et Al., Respondents, and Samuel Rubel Et Al., Respondents and Appellants
E.D. New York · Jun 7, 1965
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Nov 17, 1960
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 28, 1959
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Dec 28, 1945
City of New York Municipal Court · Jan 24, 1944
New York Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1942
Parentheticals
pro rata recovery awarded to plaintiff who brought a derivative action on behalf of a closely held corporation against defendants, who included all the other stockholders but one
directors liable for damages, in derivative action, “where they knew, or should have known, the contract” was in restraint of trade and thus illegal