Loading…

Keating v. Conviser — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Keating v. Conviser

1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1027 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1927

Full text

Alice Keating, Respondent, v. David J. Conviser Et Al., Appellants

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3608374

Citations

1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1027
246 N.Y. 632
159 N.E. 680

Cited by

Fennell v. G.A.C. Finance Corp. of Baltimore No. 3
Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 5, 1966
Murray v. Cassirer
New York Supreme Court · May 22, 1962
Schieve v. Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals · May 17, 1955
Voneye v. Turner
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · Jun 15, 1951
Neaton v. Lewis Apparel Stores, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · May 10, 1944
Quina v. Robert's
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1944

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service